Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 166/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:166A AI generated

Constitutional Court grants poverty benefit to amparo applicant due to lack of resources and legal representation.

Case Number AUTO 166/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court granted the poverty benefit to the applicant in amparo resource 400/1989, enabling him to proceed with his claim. The applicant, Don José María Blázquez y Pérez, sought relief against a Supreme Court auto confirming a requirement to appear personally in a personnel selection dispute. The Court recognized his indigence and lack of counsel as grounds for the procedural concession.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 11.1 LEC: The Constitutional Court may grant the poverty benefit to amparo applicants who lack the financial means to bear litigation costs or secure legal representation.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional Court poverty benefit amparo resource legal representation litigation costs indigence procedural concession

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Judicial sobre selección de personal. Art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 11.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 400-1989

Fecha de resolución

23/04/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la concesión del beneficio de pobreza al actor en el recurso de amparo 400/1989

Resumen

Beneficio de pobreza: habilitación.

Don José María Blázquez y Pérez contra Auto del Pleno del Tribunal Supremo que confirma providencia por la que se requería al recurrente para comparecer debidamente representado en el recurso contra Acuerdo del Pleno del Consejo General del Poder

Judicial sobre selección de personal. Art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00166-1989_00400.pdf