Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 159/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:159A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of debate and insufficient evidence for presumption of innocence.

Case Number AUTO 159/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Manuel Espinosa Navarro against a Supreme Court ruling on illegal detention. The petitioner argued for effective judicial protection and the presumption of innocence, but the court found no debate occurred and the evidence was insufficient. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the procedural requirements for a valid challenge were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 25.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection and the presumption of innocence require a genuine debate and sufficient probative activity; without these elements, the constitutional appeal is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection presumption of innocence lack of debate probative activity inadmissible appeal illegal detention constitutional rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Don Manuel Espinosa Navarro contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que estima el recurso de casación contra la Sentencia dictada por la Audiencia Provincial de Córdoba, sobre delito de detención ilegal. Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita
Art. 25.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2550-1989

Fecha de resolución

02/04/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.550/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: falta de debate. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Manuel Espinosa Navarro contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que estima el recurso de casación contra la Sentencia dictada por la Audiencia Provincial de Córdoba, sobre delito de detención ilegal. Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita

suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00159-1989_02550.pdf