Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 154/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:154A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses architect's appeal for effective judicial protection regarding administrative building permit denial.

Case Number AUTO 154/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by the Architects' Office against a Supreme Court ruling denying a building permit. The applicants argued that the administrative denial violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, while the opposing party contended the administrative procedure was legally sound. The court rejected the claim because the underlying administrative demand lacked the necessary constitutional content to trigger the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to situations where the initial administrative demand lacks the requisite constitutional content to justify the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection constitutional content of demand administrative building permit recurso de amparo legal standing requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
visado del proyecto de construcción de dos viviendas. Art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2320-1989

Fecha de resolución

02/04/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.320/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos de Extremadura contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Tribunal Supremo, resolutoria en apelación de la dictada por la Audiencia Territorial de Cáceres, en procedimiento sobre denegación del

visado del proyecto de construcción de dos viviendas. Art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00154-1989_02320.pdf