Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against judges' refusal to suspend proceedings on legal grounds.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don José Montes Ramos against the refusal of lower courts to suspend proceedings. Montes Ramos invoked Article 24.1 of the Constitution, arguing that the judges' decision violated his right to effective judicial protection regarding a business lease dispute. The Court rejected the claim because the lower courts' refusal to suspend was based on established legal criteria and did not constitute an arbitrary denial of justice.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court will not admit an appeal against a lower court's decision to refuse suspension of proceedings if that decision is grounded in legal provisions and does not amount to an arbitrary denial of effective judicial protection.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1626-1989
Fecha de resolución
26/03/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.626/1989
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad.
Don José Montes Ramos contra resoluciones del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Motril y de la Sección Tercera de la Audiencia Provincial de Granada, que inadmiten recurso de apelación contra la Sentencia dictada en autos sobre arrendamiento de
local de negocio. Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00127-1989_01626.pdf