Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 96/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:96A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of Article 24.1 CE rights.

Case Number AUTO 96/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to formally invoke the specific rights under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The applicant, Francisco Estebaranz Rodríguez, challenged a provincial court decision regarding a monetary claim execution, arguing a violation of his right to effective judicial protection. The Court ruled that without an explicit and formal citation of the constitutional provision, the procedural requirement for admissibility was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The appeal must explicitly and formally invoke the specific constitutional right allegedly violated to be admissible.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement Article 24.1 CE effective judicial protection procedural admissibility constitutional appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2104-1989

Fecha de resolución

26/02/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.104/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Don Francisco Estebaranz Rodríguez contra Auto de la Sección Duodécima de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid en apelación de la resolución dictada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 1 de dicha capital, en ejecución de Sentencia sobre reclamación de

cantidad. Art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00096-1989_02104.pdf