Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 58/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:58A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for lack of legal demand regarding effective judicial protection in bankruptcy proceedings.

Case Number AUTO 58/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the amparo appeal filed by Enterprise General de Chauffage Industrielle Pillard against a First Instance Court ruling in bankruptcy proceedings. The appellant argued that the court's declaration of no indefensión violated their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the demand lacked the necessary constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the underlying judicial decision did not infringe upon the appellant's constitutional rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an amparo inadmissible when the challenged judicial decision does not infringe the right to effective judicial protection, as the demand lacks the requisite constitutional content to constitute a violation of fundamental rights.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection indefensión bankruptcy constitutional demand content inadmissible amparo Article 24.1 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2247-1989

Fecha de resolución

29/01/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.247/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Enterprise General de Chauffage Industrielle Pillard, Sociedad Anónima», contra Auto del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 1 de Madrid, dictado en expediente de suspensión de pagos, en cuanto declara la inexistencia de indefensión, alegada por la

recurrente y desestima su pretensión. Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00058-1989_02247.pdf