Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 51/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:51A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to procedural irregularities deemed irrelevant.

Case Number AUTO 51/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Mr. Garrido Garrido against a rural lease resolution. The applicant argued that procedural irregularities in the lower courts rendered the judicial protection ineffective under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, while the state contended these flaws were irrelevant to the case's outcome. The Court ruled that the procedural defects did not affect the congruence of the final decision, thereby denying the claim of ineffective judicial protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: Procedural irregularities in lower court proceedings are inadmissible as grounds for ineffective judicial protection if they do not affect the congruence of the final resolution.

Keywords

AI generated
ineffective judicial protection procedural irregularities congruence of resolution rural lease disputes Article 24.1 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Don Benjamín Garrido Garrido contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Plasencia, en autos sobre resolución de arrendamientos rústicos, y de la Audiencia Provincial de Cáceres, resolutoria de la apelación, art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1647-1989

Fecha de resolución

29/01/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.647/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: irregularidades procesales irrelevantes; congruencia de la resolución recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Benjamín Garrido Garrido contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Plasencia, en autos sobre resolución de arrendamientos rústicos, y de la Audiencia Provincial de Cáceres, resolutoria de la apelación, art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00051-1989_01647.pdf