Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for exhaustion of judicial remedies due to non-existence of proper proceedings.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust the appropriate judicial remedies. The applicant challenged a Supreme Court decision rejecting a lawsuit against a central electoral board's agreement regarding televised debates, arguing a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that since the specific judicial path required by law did not exist for this type of administrative act, the exhaustion requirement was not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The right to judicial protection is not absolute and requires the existence of a specific judicial procedure; if no such procedure exists for a particular administrative act, the requirement to exhaust judicial remedies is not fulfilled.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1487-1989
Fecha de resolución
29/01/1990
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.487/1989
Resumen
Inadmisión. Agotamiento de la vía judicial procedente: inexistencia.
Centro Democrático y Social contra Auto de la Sala Tercera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del Tribunal Supremo, que inadmite recurso de la Ley 62/1978 contra Acuerdo de la Junta Electoral Central sobre celebración de debates televisivos. Art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00049-1989_01487.pdf