Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 20/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:20A AI generated

Constitutional Court denies suspension of criminal sentence execution due to lack of procedural grounds for amparo. The Court rejects the request to halt the execution of a final criminal judgment. The Court rules that the procedural requirements for suspending execution are not met in this case. The Court holds that the amparo remedy is not applicable to challenge the execution of a final criminal sentence. The Court emphasizes that the procedural safeguards for criminal judgments are already in place. The Court concludes that the request for suspension must be denied based on these procedural limitations. The Court maintains that the finality of criminal judgments cannot be suspended under these circumstances.

Case Number AUTO 20/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court denied the suspension of execution of a final criminal judgment against the applicant, Pedro Zulueta Pérez. The applicant sought suspension under Articles 9.3, 17.1, and 24.1 of the Constitution, arguing violations of his rights. The Court ruled that the procedural requirements for suspending the execution of a final criminal sentence were not met, thus rejecting the amparo request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9.3, 17.1, 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court holds that the remedy of amparo cannot be used to suspend the execution of a final criminal judgment when the procedural requirements for such suspension are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of execution criminal judgment finality amparo remedy limitations procedural requirements Constitutional Court ruling criminal procedure safeguards denial of suspension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9.3 C.E.
3 de dicha ciudad, en procedimiento sobre injurias, Arts. 9.3, 17.1, 24.1, 25.1 C.E, Solicita
Art. 17.1 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 25.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sala Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Jesús Leguina Villa, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2297-1989

Fecha de resolución

15/01/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 2.297/1989

Resumen

Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: Sentencia penal: improcedencia.

Don Pedro Zulueta Pérez contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 2 de Bilbao, resolutoria en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Distrito núm. 3 de dicha ciudad, en procedimiento sobre injurias, Arts. 9.3, 17.1, 24.1, 25.1 C.E, Solicita

suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00020-1989_02297.pdf