Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 15/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:15A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights under Articles 14, 18.2, and 24.1 CE.

Case Number AUTO 15/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible due to a formal defect in the invocation of constitutional rights. The applicant, Abdel Kader El Khales, sought protection under Articles 14, 18.2, and 24.1 of the Constitution after being acquitted of coercion charges by lower courts. The Court ruled that the applicant failed to formally specify which specific rights were violated, rendering the appeal procedurally defective.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14, 18.2 y 24.1 C.E.: The appeal for constitutional protection is inadmissible if the applicant fails to formally specify the content of the constitutional rights claimed to be violated.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement constitutional protection appeal procedural defect inadmissibility specific rights specification Articles 14 18.2 24.1 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Arts. 14, 18.2 y 24.1 C.E.
Art. 18.2 C.E.
Art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1778-1989

Fecha de resolución

15/01/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.778/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Abdel Kader El Khales contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 4 de Móstoles, desestimatoria del recurso de apelación interpuesto por el actor en amparo, que confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 2 de dicha ciudad, absolutoria de falta de

coacciones. Arts. 14, 18.2 y 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00015-1989_01778.pdf