Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 14/1990 ECLI:ES:TC:1990:14A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of motivation and failure to compare equal situations under Articles 14 and 24.

Case Number AUTO 14/1990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the lower court's judgment lacked sufficient motivation and failed to establish a proper comparison for the equality claim. The applicant argued for recognition of interim services based on equal treatment, but the court found the administrative decision insufficiently reasoned. Consequently, the protection of effective judicial access and the principle of equality were not violated in the manner alleged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal if the lower court's decision lacks adequate motivation or fails to compare the applicant's situation with others in an equal context.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection principle of equality lack of motivation procedural equality constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1668-1989

Fecha de resolución

15/01/1990

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.668/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Agustín García García contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo contencioso-administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid, en recurso relativo a resolución denegatoria de reconocimiento de servicios interinos prestados a la Administración.

Arts. 14 y 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1990/1990_00014-1989_01668.pdf