Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 598/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:598A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to procedural defects in auction proceedings.

Case Number AUTO 598/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the effective judicial protection guaranteed by Article 24.1 of the Constitution was not violated. The appellant challenged auction and adjudication decisions from a First Instance Court in Toledo, arguing for the nullification of procedural acts. The Court found the claim lacked merit because the lower court's procedures did not infringe upon the appellant's constitutional rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for lack of effective judicial protection when the challenged administrative or judicial acts do not constitute a violation of the right to a court or legal certainty.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection Article 24.1 Constitution auction proceedings procedural nullity adjudication decisions inadmissible appeal judicial review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1433-1989

Fecha de resolución

11/12/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.433/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: requerimiento de pago: notificación de subasta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Pablo Salvador Bullón. Resoluciones del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 1 de Toledo dictadas en procedimiento del artículo 131 de la Ley Hipotecaria que acuerdan subasta de una finca y adjudicación de la misma y deniegan la nulidad de actuaciones.

Art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00598-1989_01433.pdf