Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 518/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:518A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient reasoning in eviction order.

Case Number AUTO 518/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal against an eviction order that had been declared deserted. The applicant argued that the lower court failed to provide adequate reasoning, violating the right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the lack of substantive motivation in the eviction proceedings rendered the remedy ineffective, thus justifying the inadmissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection is violated when a court decision lacks the necessary substantive reasoning to allow for meaningful review, rendering the remedy illusory.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection lack of reasoning eviction proceedings constitutional appeal substantive motivation illusory remedy Article 24.1 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Hoteles VAR, S.A. Auto del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Granada, que declara desierto el recurso de apelación contra sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 4 de Granada en juicio verbal de desahucio. Art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 850-1989

Fecha de resolución

30/10/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 850/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la resolución recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Hoteles VAR, S.A. Auto del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Granada, que declara desierto el recurso de apelación contra sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 4 de Granada en juicio verbal de desahucio. Art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00518-1989_00850.pdf