Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 484/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:484A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of constitutional demand regarding penal analogy application.

Case Number AUTO 484/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of fundamental rights filed by Rafael Mateos Yuste. The applicant sought suspension of a criminal conviction for illegal detention based on Article 25.1 of the Constitution, arguing against the application of penal analogy. The court rejected the claim because the constitutional demand lacked the necessary content to establish a violation of fundamental rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 25.1 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the constitutional demand fails to substantiate a violation of fundamental rights or the right to effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal penal analogy fundamental rights effective judicial protection lack of constitutional demand

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 25.1 C.E.
Art. 25.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
Art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1145-1989

Fecha de resolución

02/10/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.145/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de legalidad penal aplicación analógica. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Rafael Mateos Yuste. Providencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Cáceres dictada en ejecución de la Sentencia en la que se condenó al recurrente por delito de detención ilegal y auto confirmatorio en recurso de súplica. Art. 25.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00484-1989_01145.pdf