Constitutional Court denies suspension of military disciplinary sanction execution due to procedural impropriety in the disciplinary proceeding.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court denied the suspension of execution for the military disciplinary sanction imposed on the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the disciplinary proceedings were flawed, yet the Court found the procedural impropriety insufficient to halt the sanction's enforcement. Consequently, the Court ruled that the disciplinary act remains valid and enforceable despite the alleged irregularities.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 149.1.18 CE; Art. 24 CE: The Constitutional Court may not suspend the execution of a disciplinary sanction if the procedural defects alleged do not render the act void or violate fundamental rights in a way that justifies immediate suspension.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección de Vacaciones
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Francisco Rubio Llorente y don Antonio Truyol Serra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1100-1989
Fecha de resolución
10/08/1989
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 1.100/1989
Resumen
Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: anotación de sanción militar: improcedencia.
Don Felipe Rodríguez de Castro contra Auto del Tribunal Militar Central, en recurso contencioso disciplinario, por presunta falta grave.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00440-1989_01100.pdf