Constitutional Court denies suspension of execution for criminal penalty enforcement under Art. 24.1 CE.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court denied the suspension of execution for a criminal penalty enforcement order against an electricity distribution subsidiary. The applicant, Auxiliary of the Electricity Distribution, argued that Art. 24.1 of the Constitution guaranteed effective judicial protection by suspending the execution of the District Court's sentence for a crime under Art. 583.3 of the Penal Code. The court ruled that suspension was inappropriate because the underlying criminal conviction was final and the administrative act was merely an execution measure, not a new judicial decision requiring protection.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 583.3 CP: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to suspending the execution of a final criminal penalty when the administrative act is merely an enforcement measure.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección de Vacaciones
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Francisco Rubio Llorente y don Antonio Truyol Serra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 775-1989
Fecha de resolución
10/08/1989
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Denegando la suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el recurso de amparo 775/1989
Resumen
Suspensión de la ejecución del acto que origina el amparo: improcedencia condicionada.
Auxiliar de la Distribución de Electricidad Cobra, S.A., contra Auto del Juzgado de Distrito de Seo de Urgel en ejecución de Sentencia condenatoria por falta del art. 583.3 del Código Penal. Art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita suspensión.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00435-1989_00435.pdf