Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 397/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:397A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding right to presumption of innocence due to lack of procedural demand content. The court rejects the request for suspension of proceedings. The court ruled that the appeal lacked the necessary procedural content to be admissible. The applicant failed to properly invoke the right to presumption of innocence in the demand. The court held that without a valid procedural foundation, the constitutional remedy cannot be entertained. The decision emphasizes strict adherence to procedural requirements for constitutional appeals. This case clarifies the necessity of specific content in amparo requests. The court's ruling ensures procedural efficiency in constitutional litigation. The outcome protects the integrity of the judicial process. The decision stands as a precedent for procedural admissibility.

Case Number AUTO 397/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible for lack of procedural content. The applicant, Don Tomás Cuadrado Lorenzo, sought suspension of proceedings regarding a simple negligence case but failed to properly invoke the right to presumption of innocence in his demand. The court ruled that the appeal lacked the necessary specific content required by Article 24 of the Constitution to be admissible. Consequently, the request for suspension was rejected due to the absence of a valid procedural foundation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 54.1 CE: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the demand lacks the specific content required to invoke constitutional rights, as procedural deficiencies preclude the examination of the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence procedural admissibility constitutional appeal lack of content suspension of proceedings Article 24 Constitution procedural requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Don Tomás Cuadrado Lorenzo contra Sentencia de la Sección Séptima de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, resolutoria en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 18 de Madrid, sobre delito de imprudencia simple. Art. 24. Solicita
Art. 54.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 506-1989

Fecha de resolución

12/07/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 506/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Tomás Cuadrado Lorenzo contra Sentencia de la Sección Séptima de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, resolutoria en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 18 de Madrid, sobre delito de imprudencia simple. Art. 24. Solicita

suspensión.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00397-1989_00506.pdf