Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 365/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:365A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of standing due to failure to appoint court-appointed counsel.

Case Number AUTO 365/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to secure court-appointed legal representation before filing. The applicant, Emilio Sanchís Borlet, sought an attorney to challenge a Supreme Court judgment under Article 24 of the Constitution. The court ruled that without proper legal representation, the procedural requirements for the appeal were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; Art. 119.1 LEC: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine an appeal filed without court-appointed counsel, as the right to effective judicial protection requires proper legal representation.

Keywords

AI generated
right to effective judicial protection court-appointed legal representation lack of standing procedural defects Article 24 Constitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.
Art. 119.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1754-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/07/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.754/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: no subsanación.

Don Emilio Sanchís Borlet solicita el nombramiento de Abogado y Procurador del turno de oficio a fín de interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia recurrida en casación ante la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00365-1988_01754.pdf