Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for appointment of public prosecutor due to lack of procedural standing.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court denied the request to appoint a public prosecutor for the appellant, Don José Duque Frutos. The appellant sought this appointment to challenge a labor court auto that had dismissed his lawsuit, claiming a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution regarding effective judicial protection. The court ruled that the procedural prerequisites for invoking the right to a public defender in this specific context were not met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 118.1 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection does not automatically extend to the appointment of a public prosecutor when the underlying claim has already been withdrawn by the party.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 143-1988
Fecha de resolución
19/06/1989
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando no haber lugar al recibimiento a prueba del recurso de amparo 143/1988
Resumen
Prueba: denegación de recibimiento.
Don José Duque Frutos solicita la designación de Procurador del turno de oficio para interponer recurso contra Auto de la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 1 de Madrid, que tiene al recurrente desistido de su demanda. Invoca la vulneración del derecho
consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00323-1988_00143.pdf