Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 276/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:276A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for exhaustion of judicial remedies via review procedure.

Case Number AUTO 276/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the amparo inadmissible because the applicant failed to exhaust judicial remedies before seeking constitutional protection. The applicant challenged a Supreme Court decision denying entry to the Disabled Corps, arguing a violation of the right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the applicant must first pursue a review procedure to challenge the final judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 43 C.E.: The right to a court is not absolute and requires the exhaustion of ordinary judicial remedies, including the review procedure, before an amparo can be admitted.

Keywords

AI generated
exhaustion of remedies review procedure right to court constitutional amparo final judgment judicial hierarchy procedural prerequisite

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 43 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2188-1988

Fecha de resolución

22/05/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 2.188/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Agotamiento de recursos en la vía judicial: recurso de revisión.

Don Antonio J. Galván Sintes interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo que revocó la de la Audiencia Territorial de Las Palmas que denegó el ingreso en el Cuerpo de Mutilados. Invoca la vulneración del derecho

consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00276-1988_02188.pdf