Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 266/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:266A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of Article 24.1 CE rights.

Case Number AUTO 266/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Hortensia Sánchez Pérez and another against a Madrid provincial court judgment. The applicants formally invoked the violation of their right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The court ruled that without a specific, formal invocation of the constitutional right in the appeal, the procedural requirement was not met, leading to dismissal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a formal and specific invocation of the constitutional right to effective judicial protection in the appeal for amparo, failing which the appeal is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection formal invocation requirement Article 24.1 Constitution inadmissible appeal procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1932-1988

Fecha de resolución

22/05/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.932/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Doña Hortensia Sánchez Pérez y otro interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Cuarta de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Distrito núm. 18, en juicio de cognición sobre arrendamiento urbano.

Invocan la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00266-1988_01932.pdf