Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 258/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:258A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses amparo due to procedural expiration of the action's time limits.

Case Number AUTO 258/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo filed by Associacio Joves Pro-Vida against a Supreme Court ruling denying university space allocation. The applicant invoked violations of constitutional rights regarding equality, non-discrimination, and privacy, arguing the administrative resolution infringed upon their protected interests. The court rejected the claim because the procedural time limits for filing the amparo had expired, rendering the action time-barred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 44.1 C.E.; Art. 44.2 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine merits when the amparo action is filed after the statutory time limits have expired.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration time barred action constitutional amparo statutory deadlines jurisdictional limitation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 44.1 C.E.
Art. 44.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1686-1988

Fecha de resolución

22/05/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.686/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Associacio Joves Pro-Vida, interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo, en recurso relativo a resolución administrativa que no autorizó la cesión de locales universitarios a la Asociación recurrente. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 16, 18, 20 y 21 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00258-1988_01686.pdf