Constitutional court dismisses appeal for official lawyer appointment after Supreme Court rejects civil appeal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court rejected Harry Sidney Penning's appeal for an official lawyer appointment following the Supreme Court's refusal to admit his civil appeal. Penning argued he needed state-appointed counsel after losing his case in the Madrid civil court. The court denied the request, noting that the Supreme Court's procedural decision precluded further constitutional intervention on this specific ground.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 113 CE: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to granting official counsel when a higher court has already dismissed the underlying procedural appeal.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sala Primera
Magistrados
Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Jesús Leguina Villa, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 190-1986
Fecha de resolución
22/05/1989
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Desestimando recurso de súplica contra providencia, de 3 de abril de 1989, dictada en el recurso de amparo número 190/1986
Resumen
Recurso de súplica contra Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional: denegación.
Don Harry Sidney Penning interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo que inadmite recurso contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera de lo Civil de la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid. Solicita le sea nombrado Procurador del
turno de oficio.
containers
Visualización
containers