Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 203/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:203A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient reasoning in lower court decision.

Case Number AUTO 203/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Alonso Corredera López against a Supreme Court auto rejecting a cassation request. The appellant argued that Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution were violated due to a lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient reasoning in the lower court's decision. The Court rejected these claims, ruling that the procedural defects did not constitute a substantive violation of constitutional rights warranting constitutional review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court holds that an appeal for constitutional protection is inadmissible when the challenged decision lacks the necessary motivation to demonstrate a violation of effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection constitutional appeal inadmissibility insufficient reasoning Article 24 Constitution procedural defect review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 156-1989

Fecha de resolución

17/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 156/1989

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la resolución recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Alonso Corredera López interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que inadmite recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Córdoba condenatoria por delito de robo. Invoca la vulneración de

los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución recurrida.

containers

Conceptos constitucionales

Visualización

containers

Desestimación de recurso de súplica contra Autos del Tribunal ConstitucionalDesestimación de recurso de súplica contra Autos del Tribunal Constitucional

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00203-1989_00156.pdf