Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 185/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:185A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal regarding presumption of innocence due to lack of specific constitutional demand content.

Case Number AUTO 185/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Miguel Mirantes Manceñido against his conviction for destruction and fraud. Although the appellant invoked the right to the presumption of innocence under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, the court found the appeal lacked the necessary specific content required for admissibility. Consequently, the request was rejected because it failed to meet the procedural standards for challenging the trial's evidentiary activities.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The appeal must contain specific demands regarding the violation of constitutional rights; a generic invocation of the presumption of innocence without detailing the specific procedural defect or lack of evidence is insufficient for admissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence constitutional appeal admissibility specific content requirement evidentiary activities procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1333-1988

Fecha de resolución

17/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.333/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria; prueba indiciaria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Miguel Mirantes Manceñido interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias de la Audiencia Provincial de Palencia condenatoria por delitos de estragos y estafa y de la Sala Segunda de Tribunal Supremo resolutoria del recurso de casación. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00185-1988_01333.pdf