Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 169/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:169A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the constitutional remedy action. The court ruled the claim inadmissible because the statutory time limit for filing the appeal had passed. Consequently, the constitutional protection request was rejected without examining the merits of the alleged rights violations.

Case Number AUTO 169/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to the expiration of the procedural time limit for filing the constitutional remedy. Don Benito Prado Vázquez sought suspension of a prison center agreement and a judicial resolution, alleging violations of Articles 24.1, 2, and 25.2 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim because the action was filed after the statutory deadline, rendering it procedurally time-barred regardless of the substantive arguments presented.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1, 2, 25.2 C.E.; The constitutional remedy action is inadmissible if filed after the expiration of the legally prescribed time limit, as procedural deadlines are mandatory conditions for access to constitutional protection.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional remedy procedural expiration time limit inadmissible appeal statutory deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1 y 2 y 25.2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1 y 2 y 25.2 C.E.
Art. 25.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1619-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.619/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Benito Prado Vázquez interpone recurso de amparo contra Acuerdo de la Junta de Régimen y Administración del Centro de Preventivos de Pontevedra sobre aplicación del régimen especial de vida y contra resolución del Juzgado de Vigilancia Penitenciaria.

Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1 y 2 y 25.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Resolución recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00169-1988_01619.pdf