Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 168/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:168A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of formal invocation of rights under Articles 24.1 and 2 CE.

Case Number AUTO 168/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to the applicant's failure to formally invoke the specific constitutional rights she claimed were violated. Although the applicant alleged infringements of Articles 24.1 and 2 of the Constitution regarding a traffic safety conviction, the court found no evidence of this formal invocation in the record. Consequently, the procedural defect precluded the Court from examining the merits of the alleged rights violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.: The Constitutional Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the merits of an appeal for protection of rights if the applicant fails to formally invoke the specific constitutional provisions alleged to be violated.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement procedural admissibility constitutional appeal inadmissibility Articles 24.1 and 2 CE lack of specific invocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1611-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.611/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta.

Doña Florinda Rodriguez Hernández interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Séptima de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid en apelación de la dictada por el Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 2 de Leganés, condenatoria por delito contra la

seguridad del tráfico. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 y 2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00168-1988_01611.pdf