Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 167/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:167A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for ineffective judicial protection due to final firm judgment on collective conflict.

Case Number AUTO 167/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection of rights filed by Don Francisco Sisamon Zabal against a final labor court ruling. The applicant argued that the firm judgment violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found no merit in this claim. Since the underlying decision on the collective conflict was already final and binding, the procedural requirements for further judicial review were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: When a judgment becomes final and binding, the right to effective judicial protection is satisfied, precluding further appeals for constitutional protection unless specific procedural exceptions apply.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection final firm judgment collective conflict constitutional appeal inadmissibility labor law procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1591-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.591/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: Sentencia firme. Ejecución de Sentencias: complementos salariales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Sisamon Zabal interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto del Tribunal Central de Trabajo de aclaración de la Sentencia dictada en recurso de suplicación respecto de la pronunciada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de Zaragoza sobre

conflicto colectivo. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00167-1988_01591.pdf