Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 164/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:164A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed for lack of content; facts modified by lower court violate presumption of innocence and equality principles.

Case Number AUTO 164/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible due to a lack of substantive content in the petition. The applicant challenged a Supreme Court judgment that modified proven facts to convict him of misappropriation, arguing this violated his rights to a fair trial and equality before the law. The Court ruled that since the lower court's factual modification was not contested in the original proceedings, the appeal lacked the necessary constitutional grounds to proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arts. 24.1, 2 and 14 C.E.: The Constitutional Court holds that a constitutional appeal is inadmissible if the contested judgment's modification of proven facts was not challenged in the original proceedings, thereby lacking the requisite content to examine alleged violations of the presumption of innocence or equality.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence violation modification of proven facts lack of content appeal equality before the law fair trial rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1 y 2 y 14 C.E.
Art. 2 C.E.
los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1 y 2 y 14 C.E.
Art. 14 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Eugenio Díaz Eimil y don José Luis de los Mozos y de los Mozos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1472-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.472/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: modificación de hechos probados. Principio de igualdad: resoluciones judiciales. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Enrique Tomás Ribes interpone recurso de amparo contra la Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo que casó la de la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia condenando al recurrente por un delito de apropiación indebida. Invoca la vulneración de

los derechos consagrados en los arts. 24.1 y 2 y 14 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la Sentencia impugnada.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00164-1988_01472.pdf