Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 151/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:151A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against criminal conviction, ruling effective judicial protection requires legal issues to be raised before judges.

Case Number AUTO 151/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Antonio Rojano Postigo against his criminal conviction for theft. The applicant sought suspension of execution, arguing a violation of effective judicial protection regarding the legality of the proceedings. The Court ruled that such constitutional questions must be raised before the ordinary judges during the trial, not via a separate appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to effective judicial protection does not permit the filing of a constitutional appeal against final criminal judgments when the legal issues were not raised before the ordinary judges during the trial.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection criminal conviction appeal legal issues timing ordinary judges duty constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Luis López Guerra y don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 759-1988

Fecha de resolución

03/04/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 759/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión: Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: cuestión de legalidad. Prueba: apreciación por el Juez. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Antonio Rojano Postigo interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 9 de Málaga, condenatoria por delito de hurto, y de la Sección Segunda de la Audiencia Provincial que la confirma en apelación. Solicita la

suspensión de la ejecución del acto recurrido. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución del acto recurrido.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00151-1988_00759.pdf