Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 133/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:133A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the action's time limit.

Case Number AUTO 133/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the statutory time limit for filing the remedy had expired. The applicant, a lawyer, sought a public defender to challenge prior court rulings regarding his right to defense under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The court ruled that the procedural deadline had passed, rendering the claim untimely regardless of the substantive arguments presented.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 44.1 LEC: The right to file a constitutional appeal is subject to strict procedural time limits, and failure to act within the prescribed period results in the loss of the remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration constitutional appeal time limit right to defense inadmissible appeal statutory deadline procedural loss

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 44.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1535-1988

Fecha de resolución

13/03/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.535/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la acción.

Don Fernando López Gil solicita el nombramiento de Procurador del turno de oficio para interponer recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 14 de Madrid en procedimiento oral 588/87 y de la Sección Sexta de la Audiencia

Provincial resolutoria de la apelación. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00133-1988_01526.pdf