Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 128/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:128A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to unproven notification date and failure to formally invoke rights.

Case Number AUTO 128/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to prove the date of notification for the challenged criminal judgments. The applicant argued that the procedural timeline violated their right to defense under Article 24.2 of the Constitution, but the court found no evidence supporting the claimed delay. Consequently, the court ruled that without verified procedural defects, the constitutional remedy could not be entertained.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 44.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must verify the procedural prerequisites for an appeal, specifically the notification date and the formal invocation of rights; if these elements are not substantiated by evidence, the appeal is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural time limits notification date proof formal rights invocation constitutional appeal admissibility right to defense

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las resoluciones recurridas.
Art. 44.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1450-1988

Fecha de resolución

13/03/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.450/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: fecha de notificación no acreditada. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no acreditada.

Don Daniel Fernández Aceña interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias de la Sala de lo Penal de la Audiencia Nacional, condenatoria por delitos de pertenencia a banda armada y de asesinato, y de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo en la casación

Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de las resoluciones recurridas.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00128-1988_01450.pdf