Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 106/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:106A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to indefensibility attributable to the applicant and lack of constitutional content.

Case Number AUTO 106/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Victorio Bravo Espuela against a provincial court's dismissal of his eviction request. The applicant argued that the lower court violated his right to a fair trial under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the proceedings were not defective. The decision rests on the finding that the applicant was at fault for the procedural failure and that the challenged judgment lacked constitutional significance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 54 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the applicant is at fault for the procedural defect and the challenged judgment lacks constitutional content.

Keywords

AI generated
indefensibility attributable to applicant lack of constitutional content procedural defect in eviction fair trial rights violation admissibility of constitutional appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución recurrida.
Art. 54 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 571-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/02/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 571/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Victorio Bravo Espuela interpone recurso de amparo contra Auto de la Sección Primera de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid que declaró recurso de apelación interpuesto por el actor contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito número 3 de Madrid recaída en

procedimiento de cognición por resolución de contrato de arrendamiento. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E. Solicita la suspensión de la ejecución de la resolución recurrida.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00106-1988_00571.pdf