Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 82/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:82A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and insufficient reasoning in lower court judgment.

Case Number AUTO 82/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the lower court failed to provide adequate reasoning for its decision. The appellant argued that the judgment violated her right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the procedural defect insufficient to warrant intervention. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the lower court's lack of motivation did not constitute a violation of constitutional rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must admit an appeal only if the lower court's judgment lacks sufficient reasoning to allow the appellant to understand the decision and exercise their right of defense.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection lack of reasoning inadmissible appeal right of defense procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1065-1988

Fecha de resolución

13/02/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.065/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Indefensión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña María del Carmen Labarta Cortés interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo en suplicación de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 2 de Guipúzcoa en autos sobre invalidez, SOVI. Invoca la vulneración del

derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00082-1988_01065.pdf