Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 42/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:42A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses amparo due to incongruent claim and lack of constitutional content regarding non bis in idem.

Case Number AUTO 42/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo filed by Mr. Fernández Cuervo against a prison guard judge. The petitioner sought free legal aid to challenge a prior proceeding, arguing a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution based on the principle of non bis in idem. The court rejected the claim because the request was incongruent with the existing proceedings and lacked sufficient constitutional content to warrant review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 10.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an amparo inadmissible when the claim is incongruent with pending proceedings or lacks the requisite constitutional content to establish a violation of the principle of non bis in idem.

Keywords

AI generated
non bis in idem principle of double jeopardy constitutional content requirement incongruent claim free legal aid Article 24.1 Constitution prison guard judge

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 10.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 102-1988

Fecha de resolución

30/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 102/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio «non bis in idem»: pretensión incongruente. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Luis Eugenio Fernández Cuervo solicita la concesión del beneficio de justicia gratuita a fin de interponer recurso de amparo en relación con solicitudes dirigidas a la Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo y a la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo

promoviendo antejuicio contra el Juez de Vigilancia Penitenciaria de Oviedo. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00042-1988_00102.pdf