Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 39/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:39A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against denial of evidence receipt, ruling no fundamental right violation occurred.

Case Number AUTO 39/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Angel María Velar Crespo against the denial of evidence receipt in a civil dispute. The applicant argued that the refusal violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, while the lower courts maintained the procedural decision was lawful. The Court concluded that the administrative denial did not constitute a violation of fundamental rights, thus rejecting the constitutional remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The denial of evidence receipt by lower courts does not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection when no fundamental rights are infringed.

Keywords

AI generated
right to effective judicial protection denial of evidence receipt constitutional appeal inadmissibility Article 24.1 Constitution procedural denial of evidence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1727-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.727/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Prueba: su denegación no constituye violación de derecho fundamental. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Angel María Velar Crespo interponen recurso de amparo contra Autos de la Audiencia Provincial de Huesca, que deniegan recibimiento a prueba de apelación contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Huesca, sobre relación de obras. Invoca la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00039-1988_01727.pdf