Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 34/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:34A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of effective judicial protection due to missing edictal summons.

Case Number AUTO 34/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the plaintiff failed to comply with the mandatory edictal summons required for effective judicial protection. The municipality argued the administrative court's resolution violated Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the procedural defect fatal. Consequently, the right to a court was deemed not effectively exercised due to the lack of proper notification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 10.1 LEC: The right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution is not satisfied if the plaintiff fails to comply with the mandatory edictal summons required to notify the opposing party.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection edictal summons Article 24.1 Constitution procedural defect inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 10.1 LEC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1276-1988

Fecha de resolución

23/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.276/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: emplazamiento edictal. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

El excelentísimo Ayuntamiento de Valencia interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Primera de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Valencia en recurso sobre resolución del Tribunal Económico de la Audiencia

Provincial de Valencia acerca del impuesto municipal sobre valor de los terrenos. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1989/1989_00034-1988_01276.pdf