Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 20/1989 ECLI:ES:TC:1989:20A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to applicant's own lack of defense and defective complaint content.

Case Number AUTO 20/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to appear in court proceedings initiated against him. The applicant argued that his rights under Article 24 of the Constitution were violated by the denial of his participation in investigations. The court ruled that the lack of defense was attributable to the applicant and the complaint lacked necessary constitutional content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to situations where the applicant's own conduct prevents their participation or the complaint lacks constitutional substance.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection lack of defense constitutional complaint content applicant's own fault inadmissibility of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1382-1988

Fecha de resolución

16/01/1989

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.382/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Indefensión: imputable al recurrente. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: comparecencia del imputado. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Luis Campo Mantilla interpone recurso de amparo contra resoluciones de la Sección Sexta de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona y del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 22, que deniegan la personación del recurrente en diligencias incoadas por denuncia

contra el mismo. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers