Constitutional Court rejects amparo against suspension of deputies, citing lack of procedural exhaustion and insufficient evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court denied the admissibility of two amparo resources filed by suspended regional deputies against their suspension. The applicants argued violations of rights to equality, dignity, and defense under the Spanish Constitution, but the Court found no procedural prerequisites met. Consequently, the Court ruled that the administrative resolution was not yet final and the applicants failed to demonstrate a clear violation of constitutional rights at this stage.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 25.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must first verify that all administrative and judicial remedies have been exhausted and that the challenged act is final before examining constitutional complaints.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.
Identificación
Órgano
Sala Segunda
Magistrados
Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas, don Jesús Leguina Villa y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recursos de amparo 866-1988, 867-1988 (acumulados)
Fecha de resolución
22/12/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la acumulación de los recursos de amparo 866 y 867/1988 y denegando recibimiento a prueba
Resumen
Acumulación de procesos constitucionales: procedencia.
Don Gonzalo Piñeiro García Lago y don Juan Hormaechea Cazón interponen sendos recursos de amparo contra resolución del Presidente de la Asamblea Regional de Cantabria que suspendió temporalmente a los recurrentes en sus condiciones de Diputado Regional.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 18.4, 23.1, 24.1 y 25.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers