Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of constitutional content in the initial demand.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Ernesto García López against the Supreme Court's refusal to admit a preliminary complaint. The appellant argued that the Supreme Court violated his right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution by failing to recognize the constitutional nature of his initial claim. The Court ruled that the appeal lacked the necessary constitutional content because the underlying demand did not raise a genuine constitutional issue warranting review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 54 C.E.: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the initial demand lacks the constitutional content required to justify a review of the judicial decision.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1482-1988
Fecha de resolución
12/12/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.482/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: antejuicio. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Ernesto García López interpone recurso de amparo contra el Auto dictado por la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo, por el que se decretó no haber lugar a la admisión de querella en antejuicio. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art.
24.1 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01310-1988_01482.pdf