Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1254/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1254A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of comparison terms and insufficient judicial motivation.

Case Number AUTO 1254/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Doña Inés Cano Sánchez and others against a labor court judgment regarding salary increases. The applicants argued violations of equality and effective judicial protection rights under the Constitution, but the court found no valid comparison terms for the equality claim and noted the lower court's failure to adequately motivate its decision. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the fundamental requirements for admissibility were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Arts. 14, 9.2, 24 y 28 C.E.: The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the equality claim lacks necessary comparison terms and the lower court's judgment suffers from insufficient motivation, thereby failing to provide effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
Constitutional appeal inadmissibility Principle of equality comparison terms Effective judicial protection motivation Labor court judgment review Constitutional rights violation claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 9.2, 24 y 28 C.E.
Art. 9.2 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 28 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 789-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/11/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 789/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Inés Cano Sánchez y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo en suplicación de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 20 de Madrid, en autos sobre reclamación sobre aumentos retributivos. Invocan la

vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 9.2, 24 y 28 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01254-1988_00789.pdf