Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1249/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1249A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to prove the right to a court was violated.

Case Number AUTO 1249/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to substantiate the formal invocation of the right to a court. Although the applicant claimed a violation of Article 24.1 of the Constitution regarding eviction proceedings, the court found no evidence of procedural defects. Consequently, the court ruled that the constitutional content of the claim was lacking due to this failure to prove the alleged violation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires the applicant to substantiate the formal invocation of the right to a court, and the appeal is inadmissible if this requirement is not met.

Keywords

AI generated
right to a court formal invocation substantiation of claim inadmissible appeal procedural defect eviction proceedings Article 24.1 CE

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Francisco Tomás y Valiente, don Luis Díez-Picazo y Ponce de León y don Eugenio Díaz Eimil.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 151-1988

Fecha de resolución

21/11/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 151/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: no acreditada. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Julián Gonzalo Rodríguez interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sección Primera de la Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza que en apelación confirma la del Juzgado de Distrito núm. 9, en juicio verbal de desahucio por precario. Invoca la

vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01249-1988_00151.pdf