Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1230/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1230A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses strike right claim due to lack of constitutional content in the demand.

Case Number AUTO 1230/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal for protection filed by Ebroacero, S.A. against a labor court judgment regarding a collective conflict. The company argued that the lower court violated its right to strike under Article 28.2 of the Constitution, but the Court found the demand lacked sufficient constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the legal issue raised did not meet the threshold for constitutional review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 28.2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court requires a demand for protection to possess sufficient constitutional content, dismissing appeals where the alleged violation is merely a procedural or non-constitutional labor dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
right to strike constitutional content appeal for protection collective conflict labor law Constitutional Court inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 28.2 C.E.
la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 28.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 835-1988

Fecha de resolución

07/11/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 835/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho de huelga: ejercicio lícito. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Ebroacero, S.A.», interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Tribunal Central de Trabajo en recurso de suplicación respecto de la dictada por la Magistratura de Trabajo núm. 6 de Zaragoza, en autos sobre reclamación por conflicto colectivo. Invoca

la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 28.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01230-1988_00835.pdf