Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1223/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1223A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to cure procedural defects in the complaint.

Case Number AUTO 1223/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the applicant failed to cure procedural defects in the complaint. Don Andrés Emo del Seijo challenged rulings on unjust enrichment and the prosecutor's decision not to file a review appeal, claiming a violation of the right to a court under Article 24.2 of the Constitution. The court rejected the claim as the necessary procedural corrections were not made before the appeal could be properly examined.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; The Constitutional Court declares an appeal inadmissible when the applicant fails to cure the procedural defects required by the law before the appeal can be admitted to proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural defects failure to cure inadmissible appeal right to court constitutional complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 590-1988

Fecha de resolución

07/11/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 590/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: no subsanación.

Don Andrés Emo del Seijo interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencias del Juzgado de Instrucción núm. 7 de Málaga y de la Audiencia Provincial, condenatorias del actor, por apropiación indebida, así como contra la decisión de Fiscalía de no interponer

recurso de revisión. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01223-1988_00590.pdf