Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1183/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1183A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to formally invoke the right under Article 24 of the Constitution.

Case Number AUTO 1183/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the petitioner failed to formally invoke the specific constitutional right violated. The applicant challenged a property dispute judgment by claiming a violation of Article 24 of the Constitution but did not explicitly identify the right infringed. Consequently, the court rejected the case for lacking the required formal invocation of the constitutional provision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 C.E.; The appeal must formally and specifically invoke the constitutional right alleged to be violated, otherwise it is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of right Article 24 Constitution inadmissible appeal procedural defect constitutional protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 C.E.
consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 529-1988

Fecha de resolución

24/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 529/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Defectos de la demanda: subsanación. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Angel Casillas Martín interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito de Avila, en juicio sobre acción negatoria de servidumbre, y de la Audiencia Provincial confirmatoria en apelación. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos

consagrados en el art. 24 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01183-1988_00529.pdf