Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 1182/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1182A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to procedural expiration of the civil claim against negligence.

Case Number AUTO 1182/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the underlying civil claim had expired due to the passage of time. Doña Artura Luengo González challenged a court ruling condemning her for negligence, arguing this violated her right to a court under Article 24.1 of the Constitution. The Court rejected the claim, ruling that the procedural deadline for filing the initial lawsuit had lapsed, rendering the constitutional remedy untimely.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 44.1 C.E.: The right to a court is not absolute and does not apply when the claimant fails to exercise it within the legally prescribed time limits, resulting in the loss of the right to judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expiration statute of limitations right to court civil negligence claim constitutional appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 44.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 518-1988

Fecha de resolución

24/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 518/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Plazos procesales: caducidad de la demanda.

Doña Artura Luengo González interpone recurso de amparo contra Autos del Juzgado de Instrucción de Arenys de Mar que declaran desierto recurso de apelación contra Sentencia del Juzgado de Distrito, condenatoria por falta de imprudencia, y contra Auto de

la Sección Primera de la Audiencia Provincial que inadmite recurso de queja. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01182-1988_00518.pdf