Constitutional Court dismisses amparo for lack of motivation in administrative court judgment denying union body integration.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the amparo filed by Don José Almela Gómez and others against an administrative court judgment denying their integration into the Technical Administrative Union Body. The applicants argued that the lower court's decision violated their right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution due to insufficient reasoning. The Court ruled that the lack of adequate motivation in the administrative judgment constituted a procedural defect preventing the effective exercise of the right to judicial protection.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 C.E.; Art. 14 C.E.: The right to effective judicial protection is violated when a court judgment lacks the necessary motivation to allow the parties to understand the grounds of the decision and to exercise their right of defense.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Segunda
Magistrados
Don Francisco Rubio Llorente, don Antonio Truyol Serra y don Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 480-1988
Fecha de resolución
24/10/1988
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 480/1988
Resumen
Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la Sentencia. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don José Almela Gómez y otros interponen recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Segunda de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de la Audiencia Territorial de Madrid, en recurso contra resoluciones del Director general de la Función Pública, denegatorias
de solicitud de integración en el Cuerpo Técnico de Administración Sindical. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 14 C.E.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01174-1988_00480.pdf