Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1144/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1144A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of comparison terms and ineffective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 1144/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Alvaro Espinosa Cabezas against disciplinary sanctions imposed on a judge. The appellant argued violations of equality, privacy, and effective judicial protection rights under Articles 14, 18, 24, and 25 of the Constitution. The court rejected these claims because the comparison terms for the equality argument were missing and the challenged sentence lacked the necessary constitutional content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 C.E.; Art. 24 C.E.: The principle of equality requires comparable terms for comparison, and effective judicial protection demands that the challenged decision possesses the requisite constitutional content to be subject to constitutional review.

Keywords

AI generated
Principle of Equality Effective Judicial Protection Constitutional Content Disciplinary Sanctions Judicial Independence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 18, 24 y 25 C.E.
Art. 18 C.E.
Art. 24 C.E.
Art. 25 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1025-1988

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.025/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Alvaro Espinosa Cabezas interpone recurso de amparo contra Resolución del Consejo General del Poder Judicial y Sentencia del Pleno del Tribunal Supremo derivada de recurso contencioso-administrativo en relación con Acuerdos sancionadores por faltas

disciplinarias. Invoca la vulneración de los derechos consagrados en los arts. 14, 18, 24 y 25 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01144-1988_01025.pdf