Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1140/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1140A AI generated

Spanish Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding presumption of innocence and effective judicial protection.

Case Number AUTO 1140/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Mr. Mesquida Paltre against a criminal conviction for monetary crimes. The petitioner argued that the Supreme Court violated his right to the presumption of innocence and effective judicial protection through rhetorical invocation rather than substantive reasoning. The court rejected these claims, finding the lower court's decision did not infringe constitutional rights and that the demand lacked necessary content.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.2 C.E.; Art. 25.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court dismisses appeals where the lower court's reasoning, even if rhetorical, does not substantively violate the right to effective judicial protection or the presumption of innocence.

Keywords

AI generated
presumption of innocence effective judicial protection constitutional appeal monetary crimes rhetorical invocation Supreme Court criminal conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.2 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.
Art. 25.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Doña Gloria Begué Cantón, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Jesús Leguina Villa.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 752-1988

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 752/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: valoración de la prueba. Derecho a la libertad: reserva de Ley Orgánica. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: invocación retórica. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Mesquida Paltre interpone recurso de amparo contra la Sentencia de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo en recurso de casación respecto de la dictada por la Sección Primera de lo Penal de la Audiencia Nacional, condenatoria por delito

monetario. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.2 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1988/1988_01140-1988_00752.pdf