Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 1131/1988 ECLI:ES:TC:1988:1131A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal against Supreme Court judgment for lack of constitutional demand content.

Case Number AUTO 1131/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by the administrative entity against a Supreme Court judgment regarding urbanization maintenance damages. The appellant claimed a violation of the right to effective judicial protection under Article 24.1 of the Constitution, but the Court found the original demand lacked necessary constitutional content. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the Supreme Court's decision did not require constitutional review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 C.E.; Art. 53.1 C.E.: The Constitutional Court rejects an appeal for lack of constitutional demand content when the lower court's decision does not require constitutional review.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal inadmissibility lack of constitutional demand effective judicial protection Supreme Court judgment administrative liability damages

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 C.E.
Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.
Art. 53.1 C.E.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Ángel Latorre Segura, don Carlos de la Vega Benayas y don Luis López Guerra.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 503-1988

Fecha de resolución

10/10/1988

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 503/1988

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: congruencia de la Sentencia recurrida. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

La Entidad Administrativa Jurídico-Urbanística, Colaboradora y de Conservación de la Hacienda de La Manga de Cartagena (CARTAGOTUR) interpone recurso de amparo contra Sentencia de la Sala Cuarta del Tribunal Supremo en recurso sobre reclamación de daños

y perjuicios por el mantenimiento y conservación de una urbanización, deducida contra el Ayuntamiento de Cartagena. Invoca la vulneración del derecho consagrado en el art. 24.1 C.E.

containers

Visualización

containers